Forms

See All Topics

Standardized Court Forms

Standardized court forms are the linchpin to successful self-represented litigant (SRL) services, aiding SRLs, court staff, attorneys, and judges.

SRLs benefit because standardized forms facilitate access to the court, as well as make transparent the legally relevant facts necessary for a decision on the merits. In other words, a well written form can help a litigant understand what the judge needs to know, thereby making the SRL more efficient during hearings.

Court staff benefit because standardized court forms preserve staff neutrality, standardize information, ease training burdens, and increase individual and system efficiency; a good standardized form will provide court staff with all the necessary and relevant information located in predictable places on the document.

Attorneys benefit because standardized forms reduce the administrative and clerical load on attorneys, allowing attorneys to spend more of their time practicing at the top of their licenses, providing legal advice.

Judges benefit because standardized forms allow them to locate quickly and easily the necessary and relevant information to render a decision.

Finally, in addition to improving access courts, standardized forms improve the quality of justice by ensuring that all judges in that jurisdiction are briefed consistently on all of the necessary elements to any particular procedural or substantive request; when individual judges or courts within a jurisdiction create their own forms, inconsistency necessarily creeps in. Standardized court forms improve the consistency and transparency of the judicial branch, both of which are essential for public trust and confidence in the courts.

SRLN 2021 Forms Competition
  A giant congratulations to our SRLN 2021 Forms Competition Winners!   Automated Forms Category: UMKC School of Law, Bloch Law Library  
Year published: 2021
Document Author: SRLN
Resource: Michigan Bar's Limited Scope Tool Kit (Michigan State Bar 2020)
The State Bar of Michigan's Practice Management Resource Center has a dedicated Limited Scope page that provides comprehensive guidance materials on limited scope representation in a Limited Scope Tool Kit. The tool kit provides practice guidance, court forms, and sample forms for lawyers, linked below and attached to this page.
Document Author: Michigan State Bar
Conference: The Lab @DC, Office of the City Administrator Form-a-Palooza (Washington, DC 2018)
The 2018 Form-a-Palooza sponsored by the Lab @DC, Office of the City Administrator, will occur in Washington, DC and will focus on producing a prototype of select government forms.  For more information see the Lab @DC event page.
Year published: 2018
Document Author: SRLN
Webinar: How to Incorporate Plain Language into Court Forms, Websites, and Other Materials (NACM 2017)
The National Association for Court Management (nacmnet.org), in partnership with the Self-represented Litigation Network (SRLN), invites you to participate in its third webinar of 2017 on November 29, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. EST. 
Year published: 2017
Document Author: Self-Represented Litigation Network
SRLN 2017 Forms Competition
2017 SRLN Forms & Technology Working Group -- Best Forms Contest The SRLN Forms & Technology Working Group held its first ever Best Forms Contest, taking entries in two categories, Best Static Form and Best Automated Form. All forms must be for civil legal problems. Submissions for Best Static Form was judged for:
Year published: 2017
Document Author: Self-Represented Litigation Network
Book: Writing for Dollars, Writing to Please The Case for Plain Language in Business, Government, and Law (Kimble 2012)
This book collects the empirical evidence supporting the value of plain language in business, government, and law. Professor Kimble summarizes 50 studies (no less) that show using plain language can save organizations and agencies a significant amount of money. The studies also show that plain language serves and satisfies readers in every possible way. When information is in plain language, typical readers have an easier time understanding and following instructions.
Year published: 2012
Document Author: Joseph Kimble
Report: Can Translation Software Help Legal Services Agencies Deliver Legal Information More Effectively in Foreign Languages and Plain English? (Hineline & Hogue 2013)
This report investigates the current and possible uses of translation tools, including fully-automated machine translation and a somewhat different translation technology, translation memory. Translation memory re-uses whole phrases that an expert has previously translated. We investigate the use of machine translation, translation memory management software, and other computer-assisted translation tools for legal information in the justice community context.
Year published: 2013
Document Author: Anna Heinline, Jeff Hogue
Article: Improving Access to Justice: Plain Language Family Law Court Forms in Washington State (Dyer, Fairbanks, Greiner, Barron, Skreen, Cerrillo-Ramirez, Lee, Hinsee 2013)
From the Abstract:
Year published: 2013
Document Author: Charles R. Dyer, Joan E. Fairbanks, M. Lynn Greiner, Kirsten Barron, Janet L. Skreen, Josefina Cerrillo-Ramirez, Andrew Lee, Bill Hinsee
Weblinks: Efficiencies and Innovation in California (Judicial Branch of California 2015)
On its webpage entitled, Efficiencies & Innovations (courts.ca.gov), the The California judicial branch, which is widely acknowledged as a national leader in developing and implementing programs that enhance access to justice, provides information and links to numerous initiatives have been implemented statewide and at individual trial courts to ensure that public service is delivered effectively and efficiently for the benefit of court users.
Year published: 2015
Document Author: Judicial Branch of California
Webinar: Technology Tools to Enhance Legal Services for LEP - Websites, Videos and More (LSNTAP, LSC, ProBonoNet 2014)
In the webinar Technology Tools to Enhance Legal Services for Limited English Proficiency, four panelists (Kathy Daniels, IT Administrator Statewide Legal Services in Connecticut, Rochelle Klempner, Chief Counsel NYS Access to Justice Program, Mike Monahan, Director State Bar of Georgia/GLSP Pro Bono Project, Sandra Sandoval, Field Support Coordinator, Immigration Advocates Network, and moderated by Mirenda Watkins of ProBonoNet) discuss technology tools that are being incorporated by legal service providers and courts, why technology is important in this context, and the challenges of
Year published: 2014
Document Author: Rochelle Klempner, Kathy Daniels, Mike Monahan, Sandra Sandoval, Pro Bono Net, LSNTAP